Underdog Stories / Sports analysis & explainers
Which MLB Hall of Fame Candidates Were One-and-Done?
MLB Hall of Fame one and done candidates can lose their ballot spot after one vote. Here’s why Whitaker, Lofton, Santana and Delgado deserve another look.
By Brett Hanson · Underdog Podcasts · November 9, 2026


Chase Madorsky had been working through old Hall of Fame ballots when Lou Whitaker’s name stopped him. On The Underdog MLB Show, he called Whitaker’s one-and-done result “asinine.” Bryce Holden had a shorter reply: “That’s crazy.”
Whitaker is one of several striking MLB Hall of Fame one and done candidates. Kenny Lofton, Johan Santana and Carlos Delgado also fell off the writers’ ballot after one appearance. Each received less than five percent of the vote, the share needed to return the next year. Their careers were different. The ballot gave each the same abrupt ending.
Which MLB Hall of Fame one and done candidates fell off?
The Baseball Writers’ Association of America votes on recently retired players. A candidate needs 75 percent of the vote to enter the Hall. A writer can choose up to 10 names. Anyone below five percent disappears from the writers’ ballot the following year, even if it was their first time on it.
That gap matters. Five percent is a test of whether a case gets another hearing, not a verdict reached after years of debate. A player can be worth discussing without being an easy yes. Madorsky made that distinction in the episode, “Episode 398: Free Agent Preview, Early HOF Picks.” Some names on his one-and-done team belonged in Cooperstown, he said. Others simply deserved longer than one ballot.
The four clearest examples show how much a first impression can hide. Whitaker brought nearly two decades at second base. Lofton’s speed came with a fine glove in center field. Santana had a brilliant stretch as a starting pitcher. Delgado hit 473 home runs. None cleared even the small bar for a second writers’ vote.
Why did Lou Whitaker get only one year on the ballot?
Whitaker received 15 of 515 votes in the 2001 election: 2.9 percent. That was the whole of his writers’ ballot career. Dave Winfield and Kirby Puckett were elected that year, both on their first try.
Whitaker had spent all 19 of his major league seasons with Detroit. He finished with 2,369 hits and 244 home runs, won three Gold Gloves at second base, and played on the Tigers’ 1984 championship team. Madorsky also pointed to his four Silver Sluggers and five All-Star selections. Those are substantial totals for a second baseman.
His case grows stronger when the whole career is measured. Baseball-Reference credits Whitaker with 75.1 wins above replacement, or WAR, an estimate of a player’s value compared with a readily available replacement. It captures more than hitting. That matters for a player whose glove and long run at a hard position helped his team year after year.
Madorsky said the case still held up if you set WAR aside. He’s right about that. A Hall voter could argue over Whitaker’s place among the best second basemen. Giving him only 15 votes left almost no room for the argument.
There is a particularly odd picture in Detroit’s record book: Whitaker and shortstop Alan Trammell played 1,918 games together, more than any other double-play pair. Trammell later entered the Hall through a committee. Whitaker’s first writers’ ballot remained his last.
Why did Kenny Lofton fall off the Hall of Fame ballot?
Lofton got 18 votes in 2013, or 3.2 percent. Nobody was elected by the writers that year. His first ballot included Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, alongside Craig Biggio and Mike Piazza. Writers still had only 10 spaces apiece.
There is a rare glimpse of the squeeze. One MLB.com writer published a 2013 ballot that used all 10 spaces, then wrote that Lofton and Piazza also deserved votes. That does not explain every voter’s choice. It does show how a full ballot can turn a candidate’s absence into something less clear than a flat rejection.
Lofton’s own numbers deserve a slower read. He hit.299, collected 2,428 hits and stole 622 bases. He scored 1,528 runs. In center field, he won four Gold Gloves. Baseball-Reference puts his career value at 68.4 WAR.
Madorsky compared Lofton with Tim Raines, another player whose speed and ability to reach base made him dangerous without a huge home run total. Holden said his first memories of Lofton came well past the outfielder’s prime. That detail rings true. Lofton played for many clubs near the end, so a fan who arrived late might remember the veteran passing through rather than the Cleveland star.
Madorsky wondered if that lack of one lasting team identity hurt him. It is a plausible thought, not a proven cause of the vote. Whitaker spent his entire career with one club and fared worse. Lofton’s 18 votes tell us what happened. They cannot tell us every reason why.
“Lou Whitaker being one and done is asinine.”
Was Johan Santana’s peak good enough for the Hall?
Santana won the American League Cy Young Award in 2004 and 2006. He led his league in strikeouts three straight years, from 2004 through 2006. Later, with the Mets, he threw the first no-hitter in team history on June 1, 2012.
Those achievements make his 2018 result jarring: 10 votes out of 422, or 2.4 percent. When Madorsky reached Santana’s name on the show, Holden’s answer was one word: “Easy.” Neither host tried to build a long case. Santana’s best seasons had already done much of the talking.
The hard part is how soon that peak ended. Santana pitched 12 major league seasons and finished with 139 wins, a 3.20 ERA and 1,988 strikeouts. The 2018 Hall ballot also had Chipper Jones and Jim Thome, both elected that year. Vladimir Guerrero and Trevor Hoffman went in too.
A voter who prizes long careers may pause over Santana’s total innings and wins. Fair enough. But a voter judging how good he was at his best has a much easier call: he dominated for several years, yet never got the second ballot that might have let that question breathe.
Did Carlos Delgado deserve more than one vote?
Madorsky is firm on Delgado: he said the first baseman belongs in the Hall. The numbers are hard to ignore. Delgado hit 473 home runs, drove in 1,512 runs and posted a .929 career OPS, which combines how often a hitter reaches base with how much power he hits for. His .383 on-base mark helps explain why that power played so well.
In 2000, Delgado hit.344 with 41 home runs for Toronto. He followed it with 42 homers and 145 RBIs in 2003. This was sustained work in the middle of an order, not one season doing the heavy lifting for a reputation.
The 2015 writers’ ballot gave him 21 votes, or 3.8 percent. A crowded year. It elected Randy Johnson, Pedro Martínez, John Smoltz and Craig Biggio, while Mike Piazza received 69.9 percent and had to wait another year. Delgado sat below the five-percent line, with no next year available to him.
Madorsky compared Delgado with Fred McGriff, who later reached the Hall through a committee. McGriff had more career homers, 493 to 473, and more RBIs, 1,550 to 1,512. Delgado had the higher OPS,.929 to.886. The comparison does not settle either career by itself. It makes a one-year dismissal look awfully quick.
Delgado has since received a closer look. On the Contemporary Baseball Era player ballot considered in December 2025, he drew nine of 16 committee votes. He needed 12 for election. That is well short of a plaque, though it is a different kind of result from 21 votes among 549 writers.
Can a one-and-done player still reach the Hall of Fame?
Yes. Falling below five percent ends a player’s run on the writers’ ballot. It does not shut every Hall door. Era committees can consider players whose writers’ eligibility has ended, though a small group must first select the names for an eight-person ballot.
The rules are tighter there, too. A committee has 16 voters, each allowed to choose up to three candidates. Twelve votes earn election. Under rules that began in 2025, fewer than five votes keep a candidate off the next committee ballot for that era. A second such result ends future ballot consideration.
That is the voting problem Holden and Madorsky discussed earlier in the episode while considering a crowded committee ballot of managers and executives. The committee’s five-vote rule is separate from the writers’ five-percent rule. Both make a ballot crowded with strong names a difficult place to be the candidate everyone plans to think about later.
Whitaker has appeared on a committee ballot. Delgado’s nine votes show that his case remains alive. Lofton and Santana can still be considered through the committee process, though eligibility is no promise of a place among eight finalists.
Madorsky’s one-and-done exercise also produced a small exchange about Michael Young. After Madorsky read out a shortstop’s impressive career totals, Holden guessed José Reyes. Madorsky supplied Young’s name. Holden replied that he thought of Young as a third baseman. Even between two people talking baseball for a living, a career can change shape depending on which position comes to mind first. The ballot does not wait for a second conversation.
The full episode of The Underdog MLB Show is on Underdog Podcasts, with the rest of the network's shows.
People also ask
What percentage keeps a player on the Hall of Fame ballot?+
A player needs at least five percent of the writers’ vote to appear on their ballot the following year. Election takes 75 percent. Falling below five percent ends writers’ ballot eligibility, even for a first-year candidate. It does not rule out later consideration by an Era Committee.
How many Hall of Fame candidates can one writer vote for?+
A writer can name up to 10 eligible players, or choose fewer. That limit can matter when many strong candidates appear together. One writer who filled all 10 spaces on the 2013 ballot wrote that Kenny Lofton and Mike Piazza also deserved votes, showing how a candidate can miss a spot on a full ballot.
Did Lou Whitaker ever get another Hall of Fame vote?+
Whitaker did not return to the writers’ ballot after receiving 2.9 percent in 2001. He later appeared on a Modern Baseball Era Committee ballot, which offered a separate route to election. His Tigers double-play partner Alan Trammell entered the Hall through an earlier committee vote.
Was Carlos Delgado reconsidered after falling off the ballot?+
Yes. Delgado received just 3.8 percent in his sole writers’ election, in 2015. On the Contemporary Baseball Era player ballot considered in December 2025, he received nine of 16 votes. That fell short of the 12 needed for election, while showing much more support than his first result suggested.
Sources
- 1.BBWAA Election Rules
- 2.2001 Hall of Fame Voting
- 3.Lou Whitaker: 2020 Modern Baseball Era Ballot
- 4.2013 Hall of Fame Voting
- 5.Kenny Lofton Career Stats
- 6.MLB.com Writers Reveal Their 2013 Hall Ballots
- 7.Hall of Fame Class of 2018: Voting Results
- 8.Johan Santana: 2018 BBWAA Hall of Fame Ballot
- 9.Hall of Fame Class of 2015: Voting Results
- 10.Carlos Delgado Career Stats
- 11.Fred McGriff Career Stats
- 12.Jeff Kent Earns Hall of Fame Election: Era Committee Results
- 13.Era Committees: Election Rules